skip the i-GuideIllinois State UniversityAdmissions at ISUAcademics at ISUEvents at ISUMap of ISUISU A to Z ListingISU AccessibilityISU 150th Anniversary
Web Support Services's eStoryboard

Open Inquiry/Dialogue Learning Processes

Four Learning Processes (Johnson & Johnson, 1988)

Controversy Debate Concurrence-Seeking Individualistic
Deriving conclusions by categorizing and organizing information and experiences Deriving conclusions by categorizing and organizing information and experiences Deriving conclusions by categorizing and organizing information and experiences Deriving conclusions by categorizing and organizing information and experiences
Being challenged by opposing views Being challenged by opposing views Quick compromise to one view Presence of only one view
Uncertainty about the correctness of own view, cognitive conflict Uncertainty about the correctness of own view, cognitive conflict High certainty High certainty
High epistemic curiosity Moderate epistemic curiosity Absence of epistemic curiosity No epistemic curiosity
Active representation and elaboration of position and rationale Active representation and elaboration of position and rationale Active restatement of original position No oral statement of position
High reconceptualization Moderate reconceptualization No reconceptualization No reconceptualization
High productivity Moderate productivity Low productivity Low productivity
High positive cathexis Moderate positive cathexis Low positive cathexis Low positive cathexis

 

 Importance of Open Inquiry