Relation of Open Inquiry to Civic Dialogue
| Controversy | Debate | Concurrence-Seeking | Individualistic |
| Deriving conclusions by categorizing and organizing information and experiences | Deriving conclusions by categorizing and organizing information and experiences | Deriving conclusions by categorizing and organizing information and experiences | Deriving conclusions by categorizing and organizing information and experiences |
| Being challenged by opposing views | Being challenged by opposing views | Quick compromise to one view | Presence of only one view |
| Uncertainty about the correctness of own view, cognitive conflict | Uncertainty about the correctness of own view, cognitive conflict | High certainty | High certainty |
| High epistemic curiosity | Moderate epistemic curiosity | Absence of epistemic curiosity | No epistemic curiosity |
| Active representation and elaboration of position and rationale | Active representation and elaboration of position and rationale | Active restatement of original position | No oral statement of position |
| High reconceptualization | Moderate reconceptualization | No reconceptualization | No reconceptualization |
| High productivity | Moderate productivity | Low productivity | Low productivity |
| High positive cathexis | Moderate positive cathexis | Low positive cathexis | Low positive cathexis |