Relation of Open Inquiry to Civic Dialogue
| Barriers to Effective Dialogue | Overcoming the Barriers | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Incivility – Disagreement with another’s position can deteriorate into ad hominem personal attacks upon that individual or other disrespectful behavior. | Apology and forgiveness |
| 2 | Conventional politeness (avoidance, indirectness) – Many people are uncomfortable with disagreement and conflict and as a result avoid taking a position or making their views explicit. | Teach that conflict is a natural process that can be creative and constructive, does not need to be avoided or feared. |
| 3 | Polarization – Dichotomous thinking results in taking extreme, diametrically opposed positions and adhering to those. | Look for a common ground, delineate shades of gray in between polarized positions |
| 4 | Sound bites and oversimplification – “Catch phrases” or clichés can replace thorough exploration of assumptions and issues related to a topic; most controversial topics involve multiple facets which need to be identified and thoroughly considered. | Explain and examine sound bites, go beyond clichés, discuss fine points, exceptions, gradations, and nuances. |
| 5 | Bias, special interests (esp. when covert or unacknowledged) – Hidden agendas typically result in inflexibility, impede open-minded exploration. | Identify positions, interests, and biases early in the process. |
| 6 | Lack of exposure to good models – Most people have been exposed to unproductive arguments more than constructive controversy. | Expose to examples of constructive controversial discussions (e.g., video The Color of Fear, which is a discussion of race and racism) |
| 7 | Apathy – Perception of an issue as irrelevant to one’s own life or unalterable can result in reluctance to address it. | Relate topic to personal experience and interests of the audience, expose to Active Citizenship continuum. |
(Rodin & Steinberg, 2003)